When I was surfing Wikipedia for Prometheanism, I found that all the results led to organizations, myths, and ideas that had nothing to do with Prometheanism per se. I think somebody has to put up a true article about it on Wikipedia. I'd be more than happy to do it. It might help attract more people to the main site, don't you think?
That notion has occurred to me too, and I think it's a bright idea. Not just because it occurred to me too

, but because I think it really would help a lot with getting the right sort of attention. It's high time the terms Prometheanism, Promethean (n and adj), Promethean movement, etc. came to be known in our sense, rather than the other largely pointless (and largely obscure) uses.
If you want to know what stopped me from doing it: I personally have way to much to do, given that I'm not already a Wikipede or whatever they call the people who make and improve the articles. I'd have to learn how. And of course the article itself might be a bit of a challenge, because we would want it to be as representative and accurate as possible in summing up Prometheanism. Fair or not, a great article on a on Wikipedia reflects positively whereas a poor one reflects poorly — especially in this case since I'm confident that an accurate expression of Prometheanism is tantamount to a recommendation.
If you're willing to do the job though, I will gratefully extend any help I can elucidating the subject material to make the article's as good as possible. Fortunately I've already written a large amount in the way of summaries, FAQs and such. But if I can provide anything of help, I will.
Really Delta, what a great contribution that would be. And if anyone else in the know can supplement what you do, that would very much be in the spirit of wikipedia as I understand it. Subjectivist, maybe you could lend a hand as well? Darios too perhaps?